Publications
Voice user interfaces for effortless navigation in medical virtual reality environments
Jan Hombeck, Henrik Voigt, Kai Lawonn
In various situations, such as clinical environments with sterile conditions or when hands are occupied with multiple devices, traditional methods of navigation and scene adjustment are impractical or even impossible. We explore a new solution by using voice control to facilitate interaction in virtual worlds to avoid the use of additional controllers. Therefore, we investigate three scenarios: Object Orientation, Visualization Customization, and Analytical Tasks and evaluate whether natural language interaction is possible and promising in each of these scenarios. In our quantitative user study participants were able to control virtual environments effortlessly using verbal instructions. This resulted in rapid orientation adjustments, adaptive visual aids, and accurate data analysis. In addition, user satisfaction and usability surveys showed consistently high levels of acceptance and ease of use. In conclusion, our study shows that the use of natural language can be a promising alternative for the improvement of user interaction in virtual environments. It enables intuitive interactions in virtual spaces, especially in situations where traditional controls have limitations.
Using speech for hands-free interaction in Virtual Reality (VR) is gaining popularity, supported by advances in natural language processing that enable accurate speech-to-text transcription and intent inference. Prior work has shown that voice-based navigation is effective when hand use is restricted or occupied, particularly when visually salient points in the scene, known as landmarks, can be identified and articulated. However, in many virtual environments, such landmarks may be absent or not easily recognizable, limiting the applicability of voice commands. To address this, we propose three landmark-free, user-centered coordinate systems to support speech-based locomotion in VR: Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical. Each system uses a distinct encoding and interaction style. The Cartesian system employs a simple three-digit code and requires low cognitive effort. The spherical system prioritizes precision but demands higher mental effort. The cylindrical system combines elements of both, offering a balance between usability and accuracy. We evaluated these systems in a quantitative user study with 24 participants, all with backgrounds in information technology. The study assessed the systems’ effectiveness for object positioning and navigation, comparing them to teleportation, the standard non-voice locomotion method in VR. Results show that the Cartesian system enables faster and more intuitive navigation compared to the spherical system. Distinct usage patterns were observed, with users predominantly focusing on the central field of view during navigation. Our findings indicate that user-centered coordinate systems are practical to implement and present a viable alternative for speech-driven, hands-free navigation in VR.
AortaAnalyzer: Interactive, integrated CTA aorta segmentation and quantitative analysis platform
Fabienne von Deylen, Pepe Eulzer, Kai Lawonn
The diagnosis of aortic diseases could be significantly enhanced with modern advances in model-based vessel visualization, objective parameter quantification, as well as information gained through numerical blood flow simulation. Most state-of-the-art methods, however, require heavy processing and are often split across various frameworks that require setting up complex workflows, making many clinical applications unrealistic and hindering research on large datasets. We present the AortaAnalyzer, a unified, end-to-end pipeline for processing computed-tomography angiography (CTA) of the aorta, integrating a state-of-the-art 3D segmentation network (Dice 0.95+-0.01, HD95 5.25+-5.73 mm), interactive correction tools, automated surface extraction, robust centerline computation, inlet/outlet capping for numerical hemodynamics, and clinical metric quantification. All modules share a single GUI, use standard formats (nrrd, STL, OBJ, CSV), and propagate changes automatically, eliminating complex multi-tool workflows. We developed the framework in an iterative process based on evaluations with seven independent experts—two numerical hemodynamics researchers, two vessel visualization researchers, two cardiac surgeons, and one radiologist. The framework received high usefulness ratings and feature requests drove the addition of surface capping and extended metric measurements. To assess efficiency, we compared processing time against 3D Slicer and SimVascular. The AortaAnalyzer demonstrated increased robustness and required substantially less manual interaction and overall processing time. AortaAnalyzer supports both clinical assessment and research purposes by providing rapid visualization of the vessel morphology, reproducible diameter, volume, and landmark analysis, and accelerated pre-processing for blood-flow simulation. It is open access and serves as an extendable platform.